Accuracy is the best neutrality. It’s all about the bitumen.

(I have cross-posted this editorial from my news site Northwest Coast Energy News because it also concerns journalism. Thus comments are disabled for this post. Should you wish to comment, please use the posting at  the original Accuracy is the best neutrality. It’s all about the bitumen. )

Memo to my media friends and colleagues:

网站长标题
寮佃布鏃ユ湡 鍒嗛 妯欓 纾侀张 澶у皬 绋瓙 涓嬭级 瀹屾垚 鐧间綀浜
浠婂ぉ 08:59 2022/09/26 08:59 鍕旷暙 鐚庢埛鍙戝竷缁 [鐚庢埛涓嶉附鍙戝竷缁刔 姣旇禌寮濮,闆舵瘮闆 / 缇界悆闈掓槬 Love All Play [24] [END] [1080p] [绠涓唴宓宂 [2022骞4鏈堢暘]     411.9MB - - - orion321
浠婂ぉ 08:35 2022/09/26 08:35 鍕旷暙 骞绘ū瀛楀箷缁 銆愬够娅诲瓧骞曠祫銆戙7鏈堟柊鐣戙愬偝闋屼箣鐗 浜屼汉鐧界殗 Utawarerumono-Futari no Hakuoro-銆戙14銆戙怋IG5_MP4銆戙1920X1080銆     213.6MB - - - summer1278
浠婂ぉ 08:35 2022/09/26 08:35 鍕旷暙 骞绘ū瀛楀箷缁 銆愬够妯卞瓧骞曠粍銆戙7鏈堟柊鐣戙愪紶棰備箣鐗 浜屼汉鐧界殗 Utawarerumono-Futari no Hakuoro-銆戙14銆戙怗B_MP4銆戙1920X1080銆     213.5MB - - - summer1278
浠婂ぉ 08:24 2022/09/26 08:24 鍕旷暙 骞绘ū瀛楀箷缁 銆愬够娅诲瓧骞曠祫銆戙7鏈堟柊鐣戙愬偝闋屼箣鐗 浜屼汉鐧界殗 Utawarerumono-Futari no Hakuoro-銆戙14銆戙怋IG5_MP4銆戙1280X720銆     107.3MB - - - summer1278
浠婂ぉ 08:18 2022/09/26 08:18 鍕旷暙 骞绘ū瀛楀箷缁 銆愬够妯卞瓧骞曠粍銆戙7鏈堟柊鐣戙愪紶棰備箣鐗 浜屼汉鐧界殗 Utawarerumono-Futari no Hakuoro-銆戙14銆戙怗B_MP4銆戙1280X720銆     107.3MB - - - summer1278
浠婂ぉ 04:01 2022/09/26 04:01 鍕旷暙 NC-Raws [NC-Raws] Knights of the Zodiac - Saint Seiya S2 - 10 (CR 1920x1080 AVC AAC MKV)     1.3GB 2 1 2 涔濆崄涔濇湐澶
浠婂ぉ 02:47 2022/09/26 02:47 婕暙 铡嬬缉鍖呮极鐢昏ˉ妗     3.1GB 1 10 0 keivn36
浠婂ぉ 02:02 2022/09/26 02:02 闆昏叇閬婃埐 GTA III with Ghost town map GTA3 楝煎煄MOD     242.7MB 1 2 0 keivn36
浠婂ぉ 01:56 2022/09/26 01:56 闆昏叇閬婃埐 GTA Mixed 鍦板浘鍚堥泦MOD     4.1GB 0 4 0 keivn36
浠婂ぉ 01:53 2022/09/26 01:53 闆昏叇閬婃埐 GTA3 MOD 缁堟瀬鍐湝 瀹樼綉鐗+178abc6涓汉浼樺寲鐗     2.1GB 0 3 0 keivn36
浠婂ぉ 01:17 2022/09/26 01:17 鐗规敐 [XK SPIRITS][Kamen Rider Geats][04][绠鏃ュ弻璇璢[1080P][WEBrip][MP4]     966.4MB 7 4 26 灏忔绔
浠婂ぉ 01:13 2022/09/26 01:13 鍕旷暙 鐪熼緳浼氭槦闄呮枃浠剁粍 鑾夊彲涓戒笣.褰煎哺鑺辩殑鍚庡潗鍔.澶栨寕绠赌涓.13闆嗗叏.尝测肠辞谤颈蝉.搁别肠辞颈濒.1080辫.痴2     17.9GB 7 18 12 灏忔绔
浠婂ぉ 01:07 2022/09/26 01:07 鍕旷暙 Lilith-Raws [Lilith-Raws] 棰ㄩ兘鍋垫帰 / Fuuto Tantei - 09 [Baha][WEB-DL][1080p][AVC AAC][CHT][MP4]     572.1MB 50 18 141 lilithraws
浠婂ぉ 00:11 2022/09/26 00:11 鍕旷暙 鍠佃悓濂惰尪灞 銆愬柕钀屽ザ鑼跺眿銆戔槄07鏈堟柊鐣槄[鍗充娇濡傛渚濇棫姝ユ閫艰繎/Soredemo Ayumu wa Yosetekuru][12][1080p][绠鏃ュ弻璇璢[鎷涘嫙缈昏瘧鏍″] 绱1姊濊璜     264.8MB 21 4 40 nekomoekissaten
浠婂ぉ 00:11 2022/09/26 00:11 鍕旷暙 鍠佃悓濂惰尪灞 銆愬柕钀屽ザ鑼跺眿銆戔槄07鏈堟柊鐣槄[鍗充娇濡傛渚濇棫姝ユ閫艰繎/Soredemo Ayumu wa Yosetekuru][12][720p][绠鏃ュ弻璇璢[鎷涘嫙缈昏瘧鏍″] 绱1姊濊璜     125MB 12 2 16 nekomoekissaten
浠婂ぉ 00:01 2022/09/26 00:01 鍕旷暙 NC-Raws [NC-Raws] 椋庨兘渚︽帰 / Fuuto Tantei (Fuuto PI) - 09 (CR 1920x1080 AVC AAC MKV)     1.4GB 5 1 16 涔濆崄涔濇湐澶
浠婂ぉ 00:01 2022/09/26 00:01 鍕旷暙 ANi [ANi] Fuuto PI - 棰ㄩ兘鍋垫帰 - 09 [1080P][Baha][WEB-DL][AAC AVC][CHT][MP4]     572.5MB 14 3 55 ANiTorrent
浠婂ぉ 00:01 2022/09/26 00:01 鍕旷暙 NC-Raws [NC-Raws] 棰ㄩ兘鍋垫帰 / Fuuto Tantei (Fuuto PI) - 09 (Baha 1920x1080 AVC AAC MP4) 绱1姊濊璜     572.3MB 22 3 119 涔濆崄涔濇湐澶
浠婂ぉ 00:00 2022/09/26 00:00 鍕旷暙 NC-Raws [NC-Raws] 椋庨兘渚︽帰 / Fuuto Tantei (Fuuto PI) - 09 (B-Global 1920x1080 HEVC AAC MKV)     275.5MB 3 2 17 涔濆崄涔濇湐澶
鏄ㄥぉ 23:31 2022/09/25 23:31 鍕旷暙 鍠佃悓濂惰尪灞 銆愬柕钀屽ザ鑼跺眿銆戔槄07鏈堟柊鐣槄[鑾夊彲涓戒笣/Lycoris Recoil][13][1080p][绠绻佸唴灏乚[鎷涘嫙缈昏瘧鏍″] 绱1姊濊璜     364.7MB 35 4 83 nekomoekissaten
鏄ㄥぉ 23:30 2022/09/25 23:30 鍕旷暙 鍠佃悓濂惰尪灞 銆愬柕钀屽ザ鑼跺眿銆戔槄07鏈堟柊鐣槄[鑾夊彲涓戒笣/Lycoris Recoil][12][1080p][绠绻佸唴灏乚[鎷涘嫙缈昏瘧鏍″] 绱1姊濊璜     387.5MB 29 0 41 nekomoekissaten
鏄ㄥぉ 23:29 2022/09/25 23:29 鍕旷暙 鍠佃悓濂惰尪灞 銆愬柕钀屽ザ鑼跺眿銆戔槄07鏈堟柊鐣槄[鑾夊彲楹楃挡/Lycoris Recoil][13][1080p][绻侀珨][鎷涘嫙缈昏鏍″皪] 绱1姊濊璜     355.9MB 32 1 103 nekomoekissaten
鏄ㄥぉ 23:29 2022/09/25 23:29 鍕旷暙 鍠佃悓濂惰尪灞 銆愬柕钀屽ザ鑼跺眿銆戔槄07鏈堟柊鐣槄[鑾夊彲涓戒笣/Lycoris Recoil][13][1080p][绠浣揮[鎷涘嫙缈昏瘧鏍″] 绱1姊濊璜     355.8MB 54 7 118 nekomoekissaten
鏄ㄥぉ 23:29 2022/09/25 23:29 鍕旷暙 鍠佃悓濂惰尪灞 銆愬柕钀屽ザ鑼跺眿銆戔槄07鏈堟柊鐣槄[鑾夊彲楹楃挡/Lycoris Recoil][13][720p][绻侀珨][鎷涘嫙缈昏鏍″皪] 绱2姊濊璜     170MB 20 3 70 nekomoekissaten
鏄ㄥぉ 23:29 2022/09/25 23:29 鍕旷暙 鍠佃悓濂惰尪灞 銆愬柕钀屽ザ鑼跺眿銆戔槄07鏈堟柊鐣槄[鑾夊彲涓戒笣/Lycoris Recoil][13][720p][绠浣揮[鎷涘嫙缈昏瘧鏍″]     169.9MB 14 3 24 nekomoekissaten
鏄ㄥぉ 23:28 2022/09/25 23:28 鍕旷暙 LoliHouse [璞岃眴瀛楀箷缁&LoliHouse] 鐜嬭呭ぉ涓 绗洓瀛 / Kingdom S4 - 25 [WebRip 1080p HEVC-10bit AAC][绠绻佸唴灏佸瓧骞昡 绱1姊濊璜     443.7MB 9 1 39 LoliHouse
鏄ㄥぉ 23:28 2022/09/25 23:28 鍕旷暙 LoliHouse [璞岃眴瀛楀箷缁&LoliHouse] 鐜嬭呭ぉ涓 绗洓瀛 / Kingdom S4 - 24 [WebRip 1080p HEVC-10bit AAC][绠绻佸唴灏佸瓧骞昡 绱1姊濊璜     502.3MB 8 2 32 LoliHouse
鏄ㄥぉ 23:18 2022/09/25 23:18 鍕旷暙 Lilith-Raws [Lilith-Raws] 鐣颁笘鐣岃棩灞 / Isekai Yakkyoku - 12 [Baha][WEB-DL][1080p][AVC AAC][CHT][MP4]     444.9MB 96 4 406 lilithraws
鏄ㄥぉ 23:08 2022/09/25 23:08 瀛e害鍏ㄩ泦 WBX-SUB [WBX-SUB] 銈广偆銉笺儓銉椼儶銈儱銈⑩櫔/Suite Precure鈾/缁勬洸 鍏変箣缇庡皯濂斥櫔 TV+Movie [BDrip][HEVC 1080P FLAC/AC3][澶栨寕绻佺畝涓棩瀛楀箷] 绱1姊濊璜     52.4GB 5 13 3 Seconder
鏄ㄥぉ 22:51 2022/09/25 22:51 鍕旷暙 鐖辨亱瀛楀箷绀 [鐖辨亱&婕尗瀛楀箷缁刔[7鏈堟柊鐣猐[濂戠害涔嬪惢][Engage Kiss][12][1080P][MP4][GB][绠涓璢     383.3MB 5 3 23 KissSub
鏄ㄥぉ 22:51 2022/09/25 22:51 鍕旷暙 鐖辨亱瀛楀箷绀 [鎰涙垁&婕矒瀛楀箷绲刔[7鏈堟柊鐣猐[濂戠磩涔嬪惢][Engage Kiss][12][1080P][MP4][BIG5][绻佷腑]     383.1MB 9 0 33 KissSub
鏄ㄥぉ 22:09 2022/09/25 22:09 瀛e害鍏ㄩ泦 肠.肠鍔ㄦ极 [c.c鍕曟极][7鏈堟柊鐣猐[Lycoris Recoil / 鑾夊彲楹楃挡][01-13][鍚堥泦][BIG5][1080P][MP4]     3.7GB 96 15 239 lleeopen
鏄ㄥぉ 22:00 2022/09/25 22:00 鍕旷暙 NC-Raws [NC-Raws] 鑺辩伀閰辨绘槸杩熷埌 / Hanabi-chan wa Okuregachi - 12 (CR 1920x1080 AVC AAC MKV)     232.2MB 1 1 21 涔濆崄涔濇湐澶
鏄ㄥぉ 21:59 2022/09/25 21:59 鍕旷暙 璞岃眴瀛楀箷缁 銆愯睂璞嗗瓧骞曠粍銆慬鐜嬭呭ぉ涓 绗洓瀛 / Kingdom_S4][24-25][绠浣揮[1080P][MP4] 绱1姊濊璜     799.8MB 5 1 29 鏄ラ煶鐖辫坛补颈谤补
鏄ㄥぉ 21:59 2022/09/25 21:59 鍕旷暙 璞岃眴瀛楀箷缁 銆愯睂璞嗗瓧骞曠祫銆慬鐜嬭呭ぉ涓 绗洓瀛 / Kingdom_S4][24-25][绻侀珨][1080P][MP4] 绱2姊濊璜     800MB 17 5 91 鏄ラ煶鐖辫坛补颈谤补
鏄ㄥぉ 21:58 2022/09/25 21:58 瀛e害鍏ㄩ泦 肠.肠鍔ㄦ极 摆肠.肠鍕曟极闭摆7链堟柊鐣猐摆濂戠磩涔嬪惢闭摆01-13闭摆鍚堥泦闭摆叠滨骋5闭摆1080笔闭摆惭笔4闭     4.3GB 68 18 212 lleeopen
鏄ㄥぉ 21:31 2022/09/25 21:31 鍕旷暙 NC-Raws [NC-Raws] 鐣颁笘鐣岃棩灞 / Isekai Yakkyoku (Parallel World Pharmacy) - 12 (Baha 1920x1080 AVC AAC MP4) 绱1姊濊璜     445MB 52 7 460 涔濆崄涔濇湐澶
鏄ㄥぉ 21:31 2022/09/25 21:31 鍕旷暙 ANi [ANi] Parallel World Pharmacy - 鐣颁笘鐣岃棩灞 - 12 [1080P][Baha][WEB-DL][AAC AVC][CHT][MP4]     445.4MB 30 2 271 ANiTorrent
鏄ㄥぉ 21:31 2022/09/25 21:31 鍕旷暙 NC-Raws [NC-Raws] 寮備笘鐣岃嵂灞 / Isekai Yakkyoku (Parallel World Pharmacy) - 12 (CR 1920x1080 AVC AAC MKV)     1.3GB 4 1 16 涔濆崄涔濇湐澶
鏄ㄥぉ 21:30 2022/09/25 21:30 鍕旷暙 NC-Raws [NC-Raws] 濂囧够涓栫晫鑽眬 / Isekai Yakkyoku (Parallel World Pharmacy) - 12 (B-Global 1920x1080 HEVC AAC MKV) 绱1姊濊璜     226.7MB 4 1 46 涔濆崄涔濇湐澶
鏄ㄥぉ 21:14 2022/09/25 21:14 瀛e害鍏ㄩ泦 [7鲁ACG] 鍙蹭笂鏈寮哄ぇ榄旂帇杞敓涓烘潙姘慉/鍙蹭笂鏈寮枫伄澶ч瓟鐜嬨佹潙浜篈銇虎鐢熴仚銈 | 01-12 [绠绻佸瓧骞昡 BDrip 1080p x265 FLAC 绱2姊濊璜     9.9GB 3 87 3 c8l
鏄ㄥぉ 21:04 2022/09/25 21:04 鍕旷暙 Lilith-Raws [Lilith-Raws] 鑱洘绌鸿粛鑸┖榄旀硶阔虫▊闅 鍏夎紳榄斿コ / Luminous Witches - 12 [Baha][WEB-DL][1080p][AVC AAC][CHT][MP4] 绱1姊濊璜     532.2MB 47 10 250 lilithraws
鏄ㄥぉ 21:02 2022/09/25 21:02 鍕旷暙 ANi [ANi] 鑱洘绌鸿粛鑸┖榄旀硶阔虫▊闅 鍏夎紳榄斿コ - 12 [1080P][Baha][WEB-DL][AAC AVC][CHT][MP4]     532.7MB 10 5 60 ANiTorrent
鏄ㄥぉ 21:01 2022/09/25 21:01 鍕旷暙 NC-Raws [NC-Raws] 鑱洘绌鸿粛鑸┖榄旀硶阔虫▊闅 鍏夎紳榄斿コ / Luminous Witches - 12 (Baha 1920x1080 AVC AAC MP4)     532.3MB 18 6 118 涔濆崄涔濇湐澶
鏄ㄥぉ 21:01 2022/09/25 21:01 鍕旷暙 NC-Raws [NC-Raws] 鍏夎緣榄斿コ / Luminous Witches - 12 (Sentai 1920x1080 AVC AAC MKV)     476.8MB 0 1 8 涔濆崄涔濇湐澶
鏄ㄥぉ 21:00 2022/09/25 21:00 鍕旷暙 NC-Raws [NC-Raws] 鑱旂洘绌哄啗鑸┖榄旀硶闊充箰闃 鍏夎緣榄斿コ / Luminous Witches - 12 (B-Global 1920x1080 HEVC AAC MKV)     282.1MB 1 1 11 涔濆崄涔濇湐澶
鏄ㄥぉ 20:48 2022/09/25 20:48 鐗规敐 鍏変箣鍥瓧骞旷粍 摆鍏変箣鍦&鍏変箣褰&澶╂湀闭摆锅囬溃楱庡+妤电嫄闭摆02闭摆閭傞赌匢锛氬皨瀵惰垏鐩滆硦闭摆奥贰叠-顿尝闭摆叠滨骋5绻侀珨涓枃闭摆1080笔闭摆惭笔4闭     747.7MB 4 0 24 瑙掑窛娴╄坛
鏄ㄥぉ 20:46 2022/09/25 20:46 鐗规敐 鍏変箣鍥瓧骞旷粍 摆鍏変箣鍥&鍏変箣褰&澶╂湀闭摆锅囬溃楠戝+鏋佺嫄闭摆02闭摆閭傞赌匢锛氬瀹濅笌鐩楄醇闭摆奥贰叠-顿尝闭摆骋叠绠赌浣扑腑鏂嘳摆1080笔闭摆惭笔4闭     747.8MB 0 5 5 瑙掑窛娴╄坛
鏄ㄥぉ 20:43 2022/09/25 20:43 鍕旷暙 SweetSub [SweetSub][閾冲姩褰煎哺鑺盷[Lycoris Recoil][13][WebRip][1080P][HEVC 10bit][绠绻佸唴灏乚 绱2姊濊璜     422.1MB 27 0 85 SweetSub
鏄ㄥぉ 20:41 2022/09/25 20:41 鍕旷暙 SweetSub [SweetSub][閵冨嫊褰煎哺鑺盷[Lycoris Recoil][13][WebRip][1080P][AVC 8bit][绻侀珨鍏у祵]     367.2MB 7 0 39 SweetSub
鏄ㄥぉ 20:40 2022/09/25 20:40 鍕旷暙 SweetSub [SweetSub][閾冲姩褰煎哺鑺盷[Lycoris Recoil][13][WebRip][1080P][AVC 8bit][绠浣撳唴宓宂     367.2MB 7 1 37 SweetSub
鏄ㄥぉ 20:40 2022/09/25 20:40 鍕旷暙 闆宸ヤ綔瀹(贵尝蝉苍辞飞) [闆宸ヤ綔瀹[Delicious Party Precure/銉囥儶銈枫儯銈广儜銉笺儐銈 銉椼儶銈儱銈[WEBDL][1080p][29][绠绻佸鎸俔(妫绱:鍏変箣缇庡皯濂/Q濞) 绱1姊濊璜     1.4GB 7 3 45 MingHyuk
鏄ㄥぉ 20:38 2022/09/25 20:38 鍕曟极阔虫▊ 澶╀娇鍔ㄦ极璁哄潧 摆220921闭摆缁勯暱濂冲効涓庣収鏂欎笓锻极厂罢铡熷0闆哴罢痴銈儖銉°赌庣祫闀峰銇ㄤ笘瑭变总銆忋偑銉偢銉娿儷銉汇偟銈︺兂銉夈儓銉┿儍銈纺阔虫ソ锛氢纷璩赌鎷挞儙摆贵尝础颁闭     748.5MB 5 1 23 澶╀娇鍔ㄦ极
鏄ㄥぉ 20:37 2022/09/25 20:37 鍏朵粬 钀濊帀绀炬椿鍔ㄥ 摆钀濊帀鍝掕儢娆$湡鐨勪笉瑙佷简锛乚摆绗172链焆摆500笔闭     2.5GB 4 2 38 鎭嬩箣鏄熺鍏
鏄ㄥぉ 20:11 2022/09/25 20:11 鍕曟极阔虫▊ 澶╀娇鍔ㄦ极璁哄潧 摆220921闭摆缁勯暱濂冲効涓庣収鏂欎笓锻极厂罢铡熷0闆哴罢痴銈儖銉°赌庣祫闀峰銇ㄤ笘瑭变总銆忋偑銉偢銉娿儷銉汇偟銈︺兂銉夈儓銉┿儍銈纺阔虫ソ锛氢纷璩赌鎷挞儙摆320碍闭     152.9MB 11 1 38 澶╀娇鍔ㄦ极
鏄ㄥぉ 19:59 2022/09/25 19:59 锛诧肌锛 澶滆幒瀹舵棌 [YYSUB-RAW]Chibi Maruko-chan II 妯辨灏忎父瀛怺1355][2022.09.25][AVC][1080P][FOD]     291.3MB 0 2 5 xiaoxin123
鏄ㄥぉ 19:53 2022/09/25 19:53 鏃ュ妵 榄旀槦瀛楀箷鍥 [MagicStar] 鏃呰鐨勪笁鏄庢不 / 鏃呫仚銈嬨偟銉炽儔銈ゃ儍銉 [WEBDL] [1080p] [AMZN]銆愮敓銆     3.2GB 3 2 7 jackieliiy
鏄ㄥぉ 19:19 2022/09/25 19:19 鏃ュ妵 骞绘湀瀛楀箷缁 銆愬够链堝瓧骞旷粍銆戙赌22骞存棩鍓с赌戙赌愭绁炲厛鐢2銆戙赌02銆戙赌1080笔銆戙赌愪腑鏃ュ弻璇赌     1.2GB 10 2 57 骞绘湀瀛楀箷缁
鏄ㄥぉ 18:34 2022/09/25 18:34 鍕旷暙 澶╂湀鍕曟极&鐧间綀绲 [澶╂湀鎼亱绲刔 姗熷嫊鎴板+楂橀仈 姘存槦鐨勯瓟濂 / Mobile Suit Gundam锛歍he Witch from Mercury - 00 [1080P][绨$箒鏃ュ鎺沒 绱2姊濊璜     193.2MB 14 3 131 Laputa
鏄ㄥぉ 18:33 2022/09/25 18:33 鍕旷暙 骞绘ū瀛楀箷缁 銆愬够妯卞瓧骞曠粍銆戙7鏈堟柊鐣戙愬奖瀹呯浜屽 Shadows House S2銆戙09-11銆戙怋IG5_MP4銆戙1280X720銆 绱1姊濊璜     378.6MB 21 0 133 HYSUB
鏄ㄥぉ 18:33 2022/09/25 18:33 鍕旷暙 骞绘ū瀛楀箷缁 銆愬够妯卞瓧骞曠粍銆戙7鏈堟柊鐣戙愬奖瀹呯浜屽 Shadows House S2銆戙09-11銆戙怗B_MP4銆戙1280X720銆     378.5MB 6 3 45 HYSUB
鏄ㄥぉ 18:28 2022/09/25 18:28 鏃ュ妵 榄旀槦瀛楀箷鍥 [MagicStar] 濡傛灉杩欎唤蹇冩儏绉颁箣涓烘亱鐖扁︺ / 銈傘仐銈傘併亾銇皸鎸併仭銈掓亱銇ㄥ懠銇躲仾銈夆︺ [WEBDL] [1080p]銆愮敓銆     699.8MB 2 0 9 jackieliiy
鏄ㄥぉ 18:17 2022/09/25 18:17 鍕旷暙 妗滈兘瀛楀箷缁 [妗滈兘瀛楀箷缁刔 鍦ㄥ紓涓栫晫杩峰寮鍚庡 / Isekai Meikyuu de Harem o [12][1080p][绠绻佸唴灏乚 绱5姊濊璜     402.5MB 28 1 121 sakurato
鏄ㄥぉ 18:16 2022/09/25 18:16 鍕旷暙 妗滈兘瀛楀箷缁 [妗滈兘瀛楀箷绲刔 鐣颁笘鐣岃糠瀹!鐨勫緦瀹敓娲 / Isekai Meikyuu de Harem o [12][1080p][绻侀珨鍏у祵]     478.3MB 17 4 228 sakurato
鏄ㄥぉ 18:16 2022/09/25 18:16 鍕旷暙 妗滈兘瀛楀箷缁 [妗滈兘瀛楀箷缁刔 鍦ㄥ紓涓栫晫杩峰寮鍚庡 / Isekai Meikyuu de Harem o [12][1080p][绠浣撳唴宓宂     478.4MB 22 2 152 sakurato
鏄ㄥぉ 18:15 2022/09/25 18:15 鍕旷暙 Lilith-Raws [Lilith-Raws] 姗熷嫊鎴板+閶煎綀 姘存槦鐨勯瓟濂 / Mobile Suit Gundam锛歍he Witch from Mercury - OVA [Baha][WEB-DL][1080p][AVC AAC][CHT][MP4] 绱1姊濊璜     517.1MB 68 10 581 lilithraws
鏄ㄥぉ 18:14 2022/09/25 18:14 鍕旷暙 澶╂湀鍕曟极&鐧间綀绲 [Skymoon-Raws][One Piece 娴疯硦鐜媇[1034][ViuTV][WEB-DL][1080p][AVC AAC][CHT][MP4+ASS](姝e紡鐗堟湰) 绱1姊濊璜     538.4MB 7 1 65 Laputa
鏄ㄥぉ 18:14 2022/09/25 18:14 鍕旷暙 Lilith-Raws [Lilith-Raws] 鐜嬭呭ぉ涓 / Kingdom S04 - 24 [Baha][WEB-DL][1080p][AVC AAC][CHT][MP4]     488.8MB 18 0 118 lilithraws
鏄ㄥぉ 18:12 2022/09/25 18:12 鍕旷暙 澶╂湀鍕曟极&鐧间綀绲 [Skymoon-Raws][One Piece 娴疯硦鐜媇[1034][ViuTV][WEB-RIP][CHT][SRT][1080p][MKV](鍏堣鐗堟湰)     523MB 2 2 19 Laputa
鏄ㄥぉ 18:02 2022/09/25 18:02 鍕旷暙 NC-Raws [NC-Raws] 姗熷嫊鎴板+閶煎綀 姘存槦鐨勯瓟濂 / Mobile Suit Gundam: The Witch from Mercury - 00 (CR 1920x1080 AVC AAC MKV)     1.3GB 6 2 33 涔濆崄涔濇湐澶
鏄ㄥぉ 18:01 2022/09/25 18:01 鍕旷暙 NC-Raws [NC-Raws] 涓栫晫鏈棩涓庢煷鐘悓琛 / Sekai no Owari ni Shiba Inu to - 32 (B-Global 1920x1080 HEVC AAC MKV) 绱2姊濊璜     13.5MB 5 0 32 涔濆崄涔濇湐澶
鏄ㄥぉ 17:45 2022/09/25 17:45 鏃ュ妵 榄旀槦瀛楀箷鍥 [MagicStar] 杩借釜鑰呮父鎴 / 銉併偋銈ゃ偟銉笺偛銉笺儬 EP03 [WEBDL] [1080p] [AMZN]銆愮敓銆     1.5GB 2 1 6 jackieliiy
鏄ㄥぉ 17:44 2022/09/25 17:44 鏃ュ妵 榄旀槦瀛楀箷鍥 [MagicStar] 杩借釜鑰呮父鎴 / 銉併偋銈ゃ偟銉笺偛銉笺儬 EP02 [WEBDL] [1080p] [AMZN]銆愮敓銆     1.6GB 1 1 8 jackieliiy
鏄ㄥぉ 17:41 2022/09/25 17:41 鍕旷暙 NC-Raws [NC-Raws] 鏈哄姩鎴樺+楂樿揪锛氭按鏄熺殑榄斿コ / Mobile Suit Gundam: The Witch from Mercury - 00 (B-Global 1920x1080 HEVC AAC MKV)     216.6MB 6 2 40 涔濆崄涔濇湐澶
鏄ㄥぉ 17:41 2022/09/25 17:41 瀛e害鍏ㄩ泦 [Love All Play][HEVC][MKV][鑻辫瀛楀箷]     7.3GB 3 3 6 roger
鏄ㄥぉ 17:39 2022/09/25 17:39 瀛e害鍏ㄩ泦 [Shoot! Goal to the Future][HEVC][MKV][鑻辫瀛楀箷]     3.5GB 3 3 1 roger
鏄ㄥぉ 17:31 2022/09/25 17:31 鏃ュ妵 榄旀槦瀛楀箷鍥 [MagicStar] 鍛婂埆鐨勫闈 / 銇曘倛銇倝銇悜銇嗗伌 EP01 [WEBDL] [1080p] [HULU]銆愮敓銆戙愰檮鏃ュ瓧銆     667.9MB 3 1 17 jackieliiy
鏄ㄥぉ 17:30 2022/09/25 17:30 鍕旷暙 NC-Raws [NC-Raws] 鍗氫汉浼犱箣鐏奖蹇嶈呮涓栦唬 / Boruto: Naruto Next Generations - 268 (B-Global 3840x2160 HEVC AAC MKV)     449.5MB 2 0 28 涔濆崄涔濇湐澶
鏄ㄥぉ 17:10 2022/09/25 17:10 鍕旷暙 ANi [ANi] 鏂扮恫鐞冪帇瀛 U-17 涓栫晫鐩 - 08 [1080P][Baha][WEB-DL][AAC AVC][CHT][MP4]     712.6MB 5 1 18 ANiTorrent
鏄ㄥぉ 17:10 2022/09/25 17:10 鍕旷暙 ANi [ANi] 鏂扮恫鐞冪帇瀛 U-17 涓栫晫鐩 - 07 [1080P][Baha][WEB-DL][AAC AVC][CHT][MP4]     658MB 6 0 15 ANiTorrent
灏嶆柤瀹归噺寰堝皬鐨勫収瀹硅珛澶氬姞鐣欐剰锛屽鍗婃槸鎹嗙秮鐥呮瘨鍜屾湪棣殑璩囨簮銆
灏嶆柤瑕栭牷鏂囦欢鎺$敤澹撶府鍖呭舰寮忕櫦浣堢殑锛屼篃璜嬬湅娓呮鍏剁湡瀵︾殑鐩殑锛屽缓璀板爡姹烘姷鍒惰┎椤炰笅杓讹紙缍撻鍛婅ù鎴戝戯紝閫欎簺澶ч兘鏄崋缍佷簡鏈ㄩΜ鐥呮瘨鎴栧唬鍛婅硣鏂欐垨鑰呮槸鍔犱簡瀵嗙⒓鐨勭劇鑹汉澹櫦浣堢殑锛夈
濡傛灉鐧肩従涓婅堪鍟忛锛岃珛鍙婃檪鍚戞垜鍊鑸夊牨
鍕曟极鑺卞湌璩囨簮缍(涓嬬ū链珯)鍙槸涓赌鍊嬬恫绲′氦娴佸钩鍙帮紝鎵赌链夎硣婧愬潎涓嶆槸鐢辨湰绔欎笂杓夋垨鐧兼斁銆傛湰绔欎互鍗虫檪涓婅级鐨勬柟寮忛亱浣滐紝鍕曟极鑺卞湌璩囨簮缍插皪鎵赌链夌暀瑷赌鐨勭湡瀵︽赌с赌佸畬鏁存赌у强绔嬪牬绛夛紝涓嶆渻璨犱笂浠讳綍璨换銆备竴鍒囧収瀹瑰彧灞暀瑷赌钥呭赌嬩汉鎰忚锛屼甫涓崭唬琛ㄦ湰缍茬珯涔嬬珛鍫淬赌傜敤鎴朵笉镍変俊璩村収瀹癸紝涓︽噳镊鍒ゆ柗鍏у涔嬬湡瀵︽赌с赌傛柤链夌枒鍟忕殑鎯呮硜涓嬶紝鐢ㄦ埗镍夌珛鍗冲皨姹傚皥妤剰瑕嬨赌傜敱鏂兼槸鍙楀埌銆屽嵆鏅傜暀瑷赌銆嶉亱浣沧柟寮忔墍闄愬埗锛屾晠涓嶈兘瀹屽叏鐩e疗鎵赌链夊嵆鏅傜暀瑷赌锛岃嫢璁赌钥呯櫦鐝炬湁鐣欒█鍑虹従鍟忛锛岃珛鑱怠鎴戝赌戙赌傛湰绔欐湁娆婃嫆绲曚换浣曚汉澹暀瑷赌鍙婂埅闄ゃ赌佷繚鐣欎换浣旷暀瑷赌銆傚垏鍕挎挵瀵矖瑷赌绌㈣獮銆佽璎椼赌佹覆鏌撹壊鎯呮毚鍔涙垨浜鸿韩鏀绘搳鐨勮█璜栵紝鏁珛镊緥銆傛湰缍茬珯淇濈暀鎵赌链夋瑠鍒┿赌
Processed in 0.003 second(s), 2 queries
Powered by tedmind.com Version: 1.8.1
友情链接:小偷程序  镜像站群

Last Tuesday, Sept. 20, 2011, the District of Kitimat sponsored an “educational forum” here at Mount Elizabeth Theatre on the controversial Northern Gateway pipeline project which, if approved, would carry bitumen from Alberta  to the port of Kitimat and on to Asia.
.
There was an hour of presentations  covering all sides the debate, followed by a question and answer period.

The Enbridge educational forum in Kitimat, Sept. 20, 2011.  Left to right, Ellis Ross, Chief Counsellor, Haisla First Nation,  Mike Bernier, mayor of Dawson Creek, Greg Brown, environmental consultant and John Carruthers, President Enbridge Northern Gateway  Pipelines. (Robin Rowland/ Northwest Coast Energy News)

Throughout those two hours, the word used to describe the substance that could come to Kitimat through that pipeline was the word “bitumen.”   Panelists Ellis Ross, Chief Councillor of the Haisla First Nation,  John Carruthers, president of Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines talked about “bitumen,” so did environmental consultant Greg Brown, they all spoke about “bitumen.”  The questions from the audience were about “bitumen.”

Of course, after a couple of years of hearings,briefings and educational forums on the Northern Gateway pipeline project, with more to come (especially when the Joint Review Panel’s formal hearings begin here in January) the people of Kitimat are used to the word “bitumen.” Everyone from grade school kids to seniors know the right words to use, especially since Kitimat is also the site of proposed liquified natural gas projects (which introduced a whole new set of terminology.)

When we talk about (and sometimes debate) the Northern Gateway project on the cross trainers and treadmills at the Riverlodge gym, the word used is “bitumen.”

While the Kitimat meeting was underway the rest of the continent, and especially the media  was focused on another pipeline project, the proposed Keystone XL project that would carry bitumen from Alberta down to Texas to be refined there.

So it was no real surprise when Open File Ottawa ran a short item by freelancer Trevor Pritchard on the debate over media use of the words “oils sands” vs the words “tar sands.”

Type in “Alberta tar sands” into Google, and you get 852,000 results. Perform a search for “Alberta oil sands” instead, and you end up with 334,000 results–not even half that. And if you change “Alberta” to “Alberta’s,” the gap widens even further.
So why do most media outlets tend to default to the phrase “oil sands”? Is “tar sands” pejorative? Or do both terms carry their own bias?

Pritchard pointed back to an article in the Tyee posted after the Calgary Herald attacked the late NDP leader Jack Layton for using the term tar sands.

Tyee quoted the Calgary Herald editorial (no longer visible on the web)this way:

Interestingly, the Calgary Herald didn’t so much take issue with the statements themselves, as it did with his vocabulary.
“It’s not what Layton said,” read an editorial from early April. “It’s the loaded and inaccurate language he used repeatedly, referring to the oil sands as ‘dirty’ and ‘tar sands’ — a word that’s part of the propaganda lexicon for radical environmentalists.”

Nearly two weeks later, the Herald was still ruminating about Layton’s and Obama’s language choices.
“Tar sands is inaccurate and pejorative,” wrote columnist Paula Arab.

In today’s polarized world, you might expect the Calgary Herald, in the centre of the Alberta oil patch, to be in favour of the term “oil sands”

However, most of the mainstream media seem to have bought into the idea that if the sandy hydrocarbons found in northern Alberta are called “tar sands” (it certainly looks and smells and feels like tar) it is pejorative, while “oil sands” are neutral. As comments on both the Tyee and Open File stories show, those who tend toward the environmental point of view consider the term “oil sands” energy industry spin.

Open File asked the Canadian Press for their take on the subject, since the CP  Stylebook (like its equivalent from the AP in the United States) is considered the usage Bible not only for the Canadian media for most non-academic writing in the Canada.

Senior Editor  James McCarten responded:

Canadian Press style calls for the use of the term “oilsands” (all one word), as it is both the official term used by the petroleum industry and the least susceptible to misinterpretation or misunderstanding. It is also in keeping with accepted style for terms like “oilpatch” and “oilfield” — consistency is a critical element of any effective writing style.
It’s also important to choose the most neutral term available.

“Tarsands,” while at one time the industry’s chosen term, has been appropriated in recent years by opponents of the oil industry and has taken on political connotations, so we choose to avoid it.

To which commenter Raay Makers responded:

So let me get this straight: CP deems the term preferred by the petroleum industry “neutral,” while the term “appropriated” by opponents of the oil industry isn’t. They obviously have misconceptions of the meaning of the term neutral.

An hour after I read the Open File story,  I turned to CBC TV News and watched Margot McDiarmid’s item on the Keystone debate.  In her first reference to the Keystone pipeline, McDiarmid used the term “oil sands bitumen”  to describe what would go through the Keystone to Texas.  Relatively accurate. But then at the end of her item she said “oil” would be flowing through the Northern Gateway Pipeline to Kitimat.

Even though I worked in radio or TV for three decades and know the necessity to keep things as simple as possible  in a short item, I was appalled.  To describe the bitumen that is going  through those pipelines simply as “oil” is misleading and inaccurate.

If you’ve sat through briefings, attended hearings and read the documents, it is clear that bitumen behaves differently in a pipeline from conventional oil, whether it is crude oil or refined oil.

That difference is at the heart of the debate over both pipelines. It appears that no one outside  of the local media here in Kitimat and media along the Northern Gateway route seems to understand that difference, not even at the centre of the current debate about the Keystone XL in Nebraska.

So I checked. What term is the media using to describe what will flow through the Keystone and Northern Gateway pipelines?  The media is all over the place, calling it oil, crude oil, crude, tar sands oil, oil sands crude, oil sands bitumen.

I first checked the CBC.ca site:

Max Paris in the written story tied to McDiarmid’s item uses “oil sands bitumen,”  the CBC interactive uses “oil sands crude.”

Today’s New York Times uses the term “oil pipeline” to describe the Keystone project.

In a Nebraska local paper, the Omaha World Herald, reporter Paul Hammel describes it as “a crude-oil pipeline”

In another local paper, the  Lincoln Nebraska, Journal Star   reporter Art Hovey uses “oil.”

An Associated Press story today, (at least as it appears on the Forbes site) is totally inconsistent, with the web friendly summary speaks about Keystone XL carrying “tar sands oil,” but the main body of the story calls it “oil.”

Reuters uses the term “oil” in this story 

An editorial  from Bloomberg uses “oil” in the lead

On first look, it might seem wrong to allow TransCanada Corp. to build the 1,700-mile Keystone XL pipeline to carry oil from Alberta, Canada, to the U.S. Gulf Coast.

It goes on to eloquently describe the situation in Alberta’s sandy hydrocarbons

What’s more, a new conduit would seem to only encourage the further development of the Athabascan oil sands in Alberta. This is a dirty business, to be sure: Vast tracts of spruce and fir are cleared to make way for open-pit mines, from which deposits of sticky black sand are shoveled out and then rinsed to yield viscous tar. For deeper deposits, steam is shot hundreds of feet into the earth to melt the tar enough that it can be pumped to the surface. Then there are the emissions associated with mining Canadian oil sands: It produces two and a half times as much carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases as oil drilling in, say, Saudi Arabia or west Texas.

Bloomberg as you might expect from a business site, goes on to give the argument for building Keystone XL in terms of jobs and the economy (and in a much more measured way than the strident columnists in the Postmedia chain here)

Bloomberg concludes

Keep in mind, the U.S. is crisscrossed by thousands of miles of pipelines carrying crude oil, liquid petroleum and natural gas. One of these is the Keystone 1 pipeline, which already carries crude from the oil sands. Yes, these pipes sometimes leak — spectacularly last year when almost 850,000 gallons of oil spilled from a ruptured pipe in Michigan. Far more often, when leaks occur, they are small and self-contained.
After the public hearings, the U.S. should give TransCanada the green light — and then make sure the company manages pipeline design and construction with care.

Get the picture. As far as I can tell, no one, no one in the major news media is accurately describing what will flow through the Keystone XL and Northern Gateway pipelines. Again the accurate descriptions come from  the local media in northwestern BC who have attended years of local briefings and hearings.

Oil comes from oil sands, right? Here is where the use of the term “oilsands’ leads to misleading coverage.  It is where senior editors at CP and other senior editors at other news organizations are wrong.  Saying oil or crude will flow through these specific pipelines does lead to  misinterpretation and misunderstanding and it comes directly from the ill advised use of the words “oil sands.”

Say “oil” and, although it is a generic term, most people think of the substance you put in an engine, ranging from the thick, black gooey stuff that goes into a two stroke boat engine, through the lighter oil that goes into your car or the even lighter oil used by model makers. “Petroleum” would probably be a better generic term.
James Dean in GiantSay crude and  most people would think of  James Dean covered in the crude from the gusher in Giant or similar movie scenes. Or for those old enough to remember, they think of the opening of the Beverly Hillbillies when the “bubbling crude” comes out of the ground at Jed Camplett’s farm.

So what is going through the pipelines?  While Enbridge uses the term “oil” in its promotional brochure on Nothern Gateway (pdf file), in the briefings here Enbridge officials always talk of “bitumen.” They know that the people living in Kitimat, again whether supporter or opponent, have done their home work. Everyone here  knows it won’t be “oil” in the pipeline.  But it seems that the public relations branches of  Enbridge and TransCanada  still believe they can spin the media into reporting the pipelines will just be carrying oil.

So what is going to be in the Northern Gateway and Keystone XL pipelines? Read the documents filed with the Joint Review Panel and you find out it is “diluted bitumen”  (The bitumen from those sandy hydrocarbons in Alberta has to be diluted or it won’t flow through the pipeline.)

Documents filed with the Joint Review Panel by Stantec, an environmental consulting company based in Fredericton, New Brunswick,  hired by Enbridge, and frequently retained by the energy industry  uses this definition:

diluted bitumen A hydrocarbon consisting of bitumen diluted with condensate in order to reduce viscosity, rendering it suitable to be transported via a pipeline.  In addition to condensate, other subjects can be used as a dilutant (naptha and synthetic oil)

So what is condensate?

Again as defined by industry consultant Stantec condensate is:

condensate:  A low density mixture of hydrocarbon liquids that are present in raw natural gas produced from many natural gas fields or which condense out of raw gas if the temperature is reduced below the hydrocarbon dew point temperature of the raw gas.

(Another angle the media has ignored about the Northern Gateway project. While it carries diluted bitumen west from Alberta, there is a twin pipeline that carries the condensate east to Alberta.)

What to call the pipelines and the product?

So let’s talk about Northern Gateway and Keystone XL first.   These pipelines are different from the other pipelines that Bloomberg and other media say crisscross North America.

These pipelines will be carrying diluted bitumen, not oil, not crude.

When the public think of oil they think of a lubricant that enhances flow, not a gritty substance that has to be diluted before it can move. Diluted bitumen is a mixture of sand and soil and crude hydrocarbons, with various petrochemicals added to so that that mixture can actually get through the pipelines.

The use of diluted bitumen is raising all kinds of questions.   There were questions at last week’s forum on the effect of the friction from the sand on the stability of the pipelines.  There were questions at the forum about the corrosive nature of the condensate added to the bitumen on the stability of the pipelines.

These questions do not arise when it comes to conventional pipelines which have been built for the past century.

While there have been major oil spills for decades on land and sea, there has never been a major spill  of bitumen in either a pristine watershed or the ocean.  There has never been a major spill involving this mixture of  bitumen and condensate.

Unfortunately, the ultimate answer to the question of how dangerous such as spill could be, will only be found out if there is disaster.

A photo map of the Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline (in yellow) showing its route close to the Kitimat River, site of the town’s water supply. (Enbridge. Filed with the Joint Review Panel)

The Northern Gateway Pipeline follows the route of the Kitimat River. One of the most frequent questions is what happens to the town’s water supply if the pipeline breaks.

There are thousands of pages on the Joint Review Panel website that show that Enbridge and their consultants have done all kinds of tests, modelling and contingency planning to support their stand the pipelines  and the tankers are as safe as possible. There are documents from environmental groups and others that take the opposite position.

So to maintain its already shaky credibility the media must be accurate.  Accuracy is the best form of neutrality.

So here are my style/copy suggestions:

The media should call what is going into the Northern Gateway and Keystone XL pipelines  “diluted bitumen” on first reference and “bitumen”  on subsequent references.

It is NOT accurate to call it “oil.” It is not really accurate to call it “crude.”

It is  crude oil mixed with sand and the condensate chemicals.  To call what will go through the Northern Gateway and Keystone XL pipeline simply as oil  or crude is leading to gross  misinterpretation and  complete  misunderstanding.

The media should continue to use oil when they are referring to conventional oil flowing through a conventional pipeline.

The public isn’t stupid.  If you ask a Grade Three student in Kitimat about bitumen and condensate you’ll get a pretty good answer. If the media has to produce sidebars,  graphics, interactives, explainer items,  to explain what bitumen is, the sooner the better, so that those taking part in the debate and those reporting it know what they’re talking about.

Tar sands/Oil sands

It is clear that the Canadian  media managers who decided in the mid 2000s that the term “oil sands” was more neutral than “tar sands” blundered.

Yes the environmentalists do use “tar sands” and for some it can be pejorative.  But if you have ever seen the stuff it certainly is tar.

Just as Enbridge uses “oil” in its brochure  on Northern Gateway but says the real thing “bitumen” in meetings, “oil sands” is the preferred energy industry spin term. The use of the term “oil sands” reduces media credibility.

Using “oil sands”  likely amplifies the general belief that the “corporate media” is in the pocket of big business and thus reduces the credibility  of the shrinking numbers of  hardworking reporters left working in the field.

Jointreviewbriefing_June_16_2011.jpgHere crowd sourcing and social media help. There are postings both on Open File and Tyee saying the terms “bitumen sands” or “bitumen-bearing sands” are proper neutral terms. I have used the term “sandy hydrocarbons” in this article, I came across it in a briefing document some while ago and it stuck in my mind (though I can’t remember where I saw it).

It is up to public editors, ombudspersons and style book editors to make the call here for their organizations.   I believe that if the media starts using “bitumen sands” as a technically accurate and neutral term for what is found in northern Alberta, the readers and viewers will  quickly accept it.

Staff of the Joint Review Panel brief residents of
Kitimat on the process, June 16, 2011.
(Robin Rowland/Northwest Coast Energy News
)


The big picture. Why isn’t the environment in the style books?

There is a bigger problem that I discovered when I was looking into this issue.  I checked the Canadian Press Stylebook to see what the editors said about the environment and found nothing. Absolutely nothing.  There are chapters on business news, entertainment, sports, even travel, but nothing on environmental coverage.

A very quick check with copy editor friends seems to have come up with same result across the media. Media stylebooks don’t consider the environment important enough to have a full chapter. (I may have missed some of course, the check was very quick) yet environmental stories are in the news every day.

The Associated Press was founded in 1848, in part so the New York newspapers could cooperate in getting the latest business news from Europe, first from ships and then from the transAtlantic cable.  So business news has been essential to the media  for at least a century and a half.  This, I believe, has created this historical, and probably   unintentional, institutional bias that favours word usage preferred by business.  If  media style books had  environment chapters then the question of  oil sands/tar sands would  have been considered more thoroughly and the “neutrality” of “oil sands” questioned.

Who knows what other environmental issues have been considered only superficially because stylebooks don’t have a chapter on the environment?

Reporters in the field  are often left angry and frustrated by rulings from public editors and ombudspersons who may, despite their efforts, err on the side of  “neutrality” rather than “accuracy” especially in this era of extreme polarization.

Media managers often take the path of least resistance, especially if they are being inundated with complaining e-mails and letters.

A stylebook chapter on the environment should stress accuracy over neutrality. Thus it serves the public.

A rigorous chapter in a media style book on the environment (and also on science which is also lacking) would give guidance to reporters in the field, editors at the desk  and allow managers to tell the complainers with agendas just how the issue has been examined.

This site has always used bitumen to describe what will be in the Northern Gateway Pipeline. From now on it will use bitumen sands in copy, and will use tar sands and oil sands in direct quotes as appropriate. I hope the rest of the media will follow.

Disclosure: I worked for CBC.ca from 1996 until I took early retirement in 2010. I have also freelanced for both Canadian Press and OpenFile.

Glossary of terms used in Stantec environmental report (PDF excerpt from original file)